Captain's Corner: Struggles Against OU Mean Nothing

View Small TextView Standard TextView Large TextView Xlarge Text Printer-Friendly Article

By Bucknuts Staff
Posted Sep 7, 2008


Image
Captain's Corner With Jerry Rudzinski
The Buckeye nation is nervous today after an ugly win over heavy underdog Ohio University on Saturday. Former OSU captain Jerry Rudzinski says to put that game out of your minds, because another notch in the win column is the most, and maybe only, important thing.
All we need to do for the National Championship is beat the team we play on the upcoming Saturday. That is all we need to do.

Did Ohio State look like the best team in the country against Ohio? No, but that has absolutely nothing to do with winning a national championship. Absolutely nothing! Media and national coaching perceptions have nothing to do with a BCS berth. Our W-L column has everything to do with a BCS berth.

I’ve covered high school football for years now, and I study the statistics, common opponents, style of offense, win margins, and on and on and on. As the championship weekend finishes up, it has nothing to with who I think/thought the best team is/was. The trophy team is always the team that simply won THEIR game that upcoming weekend once playoff football starts. OSU shouldn’t worry about how they looked compared to USC, Georgia, Florida, etc. It doesn’t matter one bit. They just need to win the next game on our schedule. That is long way of saying I am bummed out that we didn’t look better against OU, but I’m not that bummed out. Getting a win is 100 times more important than style points, if not a 1,000 times more important.

The defense was once again lights out. Two games and only one score given up. James Laurinatis and Malcolm Jenkins looked like Sunday players performing on Saturday. Takeaways breed takeaways. It is a strange phenomenon, but it is true. Four picks wets the pallet. These guys will watch that film, talk about picks in the locker room, and play like absolute ball hawks when Mark Sanchez throws it because they have tasted those interceptions as a unit. There is no such thing as “we’re due.” You are actually more likely to create a turnover when you just got one recently.

You always hate to see that long first half scoring drive for OU. All the good that our defense did (even on that drive) was negated by a few missed tackles and opportunities. Life is not fair when it comes to a successful and unsuccessful series.

Think about it…all our penetration, confusion that we created, coverage, hard hitting, out-running, and execution that created the 3rd and 14 was negated by a missed tackle that allowed a first down completion (even on that play…we beat our blocks and covered receivers well only to have a missed tackle give the play new life). That next set of downs saw our 2nd and 6 jamming of the run play lead to 3rd and 7. Life is good right? Nope, a missed tackle negated block beating and route covering.

Then a slant completion on 3rd and 6. Then a 2nd and 10 TD run. We can see why coaches use the “execution” word. It is this way every game in football, and for both teams, and coaches and players know life is not fair. Your dominance on 1st and 2nd down as well as dominance with 90% of the action on 3rd down can mean nothing in stopping a drive. It helps explain why football teams practice so much.

Offensively, I can only comment on a lack of favorable second down situations in that first half. 2nd and 5, 2nd and 8, 2nd and 8, 2nd and 8, 2nd and 10, 2nd and 10, 2nd and 8, 2nd and 10, 2nd and 7, 2nd and 10, and lastly 2nd and 10 (my unofficial second down scenarios in the first half). While those are convertible, life is easier playing downhill with significant first down chunks gained Now keep in mind, that can be reality as this diversified offense attempts more first down passing plays, but I’m sure Boeckman and company would like some re-do’s on first half first downs. Was it good defense, missed blocks, lack of fight, bad reads, dropped balls, missed throws, etc? I don’t know….that is what the Sunday film study is for at the Woody Hayes. Those coaches are awfully good at figuring that out and correcting the mistakes. With our coaches and veteran players, the offense will get back on track.

2-0 baby! Our play against OU means nothing to the USC game. Our play against USC means everything to the USC game.

Buckeye Leaves…

Shaun Lane - Oh my goodness. Physically quick to get down field, but mentally quicker to cover that ball up.

James Laurinatis - An absolutely inspiring performance. I can’t remember him ever playing better. Yeah, I thought he was that good.

Ray Small - It wasn’t only his punt return. He really appeared in a rhythm with his five catches.

Discuss In Buckeye Lounge
Comments
I haven't read a lot of the posts on The Front Row. Most of of those guys have too much of their egos rapped up in how the Bucks play. For sure last Saturday's game was pretty discouraging, but I'm with you: a win is win. Let's keep the faith and root "like crazy" next week.
Good Call, Captain!!!!!!!!!
I'm hoping it's like the Akron game last year...look pretty bad in an ugly, closer-than-expected win, then go out West and kick butt!
Why can't everyone see the parallel with this game and Cincy in '02? Keep the faith, Buckeyes, and thanks, Jerry!
JohnLocke: +1 BuckeyeRy: Because in '02 we were following a 7 - 5 season and full of hope for our new coach. This year follows not one but TWO MNC Game appearances where we were EMBARRASSED and we've been hoping for redemption. VERY different setups.
does it not scare anyone else that Smalls catches punts in extreme coverage. One of these times he is going to muff it and cause a big turnover if he doesnt take a fair catch in those situations.
yeah, but with just a crack of daylight, Small can score. Plus, I've not seen anything that resembles a bobble from him, including some pressure receptions. I think he's a gamer
Ya nailed it right off the bat Jerry! Did the BUCKS look like the best team in the country in 2002? There were more close calls,"Holy Buckeye",etc. than we could hardly stand. To win big games and NC's,you have to be GOOD and LUCKY! What USC has done at home means nothing as far as playing this upcoming game,other than they are one game closer to losing their second game at home under PETE. Style points-the natioal media wants to know why the Bucks should even bother going out there to play the game. Well, because, thats why we have upsets. By the way, did L.Wilson give us any hope? I think he could maybe have part of a leaf too.
Sorry to burst your bubble guys but we all know this. If USC plays against OSU the way we played against the Stanford, then OSU would kill us. The same with you. You bring that weak Ohio University mindset out west and the only thing you'll enjoy is the sunshine, I assure you, the game will be less than pleasant. As A USC fan I'm disappointed in the performance of a team which though I do not directly support, I know can play better. Its not that I want OSU to win, but I want a game that everyone is expecting to see, hard fought, 100% effort with no excuses!
The struggles against O-Who means that this 2008-2009 defense still has trouble defending the spread and a mobile QB.
BuckeyeRy is exactly right, Cincy '02 was exactly what I was thinking! Great post Jerry, as always. The Bucks will be just fine Saturday. I do believe, though, that the D will win that game out there.
If a win is a win then why did we drop 2 spots in the polls? Unlike high school ball, the Bucks won't get in the NC game unless their W's are convincing. There is no Harbin system and there are no playoffs. The reality is the Buckeyes have to beat their opponents soundly in order to change how they are perceived by the national media and coaches.
The contention that no harm is done when the #3 ranked team struggles to pull a win out against a mediocre second tier team in Week 2 of the season is ABSOLUTELY RIDICULOUS! Style points matter early in the season when the best teams are ALL undefeated because unconvincing teams drop like stones in the rankings. Battling back into the top 2 teams by the end of the year then requires an undefeated season - and some years that's not even enough! This was a huge opportunity wasted. Furthermore, our O-line (which was embarrassed each of the last two years in the NC game) proved again that they are grossly overrated by being consistently beaten by D-linemen who gave away on average 4 inches of ht. and 50 lbs. of mass. I agree with Mark May on CFD - the Trojans are licking their chops...
Oh Ye of little faith, so soon in the season? You let your expectations rule your logic. Be gone with your irrationality and ease your minds on faith and patience! Lest we forget the past til it bonks us on the head with remembrance. This Saturday will prove the haters wrong. TB and Bnee will rule the day a la Penn State last year. I can't wait for it to get here so you all stop yer *****in'!!! Dagummit! GO BUCKS!!!
Stop yer belly achin'!!! How's that mister censer? Hehe, GO Bucks!!!
2 items of concern through the first 2 games. Lack of separation for our receivers and poor blocking in the running game from our experienced offensive line. We must have a much better showing form both of these units if we want to win at USC.
Our D-line looks as though they're pulling beer trucks. Slow and oafish. How do you expect them to handle SC's talented front, not to mention all of their many skilled players. Don't even get me started on Boeckman either...Slow, immobile, no vision, with a lackluster arm. This is "The" Ohio State Univ. I know the senator give's the game start to Seniors who deserve it but remember what happened with Texas the first time we played them? Had he given the start to Troy we probably would have won the game! Same old Tressel
I was thinking about the Akron game last year. Pretty much the same deal. Lets go out there and take it to SC this week!
SCBuck, I used to think I could make better decisions than Earle Bruce, felt even stronger about Coop. As you see how Tressel handles the team, and season, to think you have the answers- can't see it. The reason Troy didn't start was- Troy. I always felt that was our year to win it all. Due to his suspension-he cost the team. Maybe it happened in the NC game too? I'm not convinced about Boeckman either. Slow decisions, bad decisions...If we were 6 games into the season, different story. IMO Pryor is the better QB, but he's not ready. If Pryor goes into the OU game, he would have had to commit just one turnover and we might not have even won that game. Tressel's dealing with the hand he has. On the upside, if we can win this game and then Pryor gets experience through the year, and Beanie gets healthy......
Great article. I thought the game was a mix of good and bad. Loved the pressure we were getting on the qp, hated that he would always escape it seemed. 4 interceptions, after watching all the dropped interceptions last year, what a blessing. Why did it take so long for us to throw deeper than 8 yards?? Maybe Tress wanted them to load up the box and get some pressure on us to prepare us a bit for the rush from USC. Who knows?? All I know is that somewhere, either on the USC board or the Meatchicken board, there is a topic with a link back to our board, "Check out the melt down on the OSU board". People really need to get a clue. There are good games and bad games. Its not the end of the world. Even if we lose on Saturday I'm still proud of the direction our football program has taken and look forward to many more years of watching the Bucks play. Really, some people act like they have only been watching football for 2 years. I'll take the last 8 years over the 10 years prior to that and the future looks even brighter. TP isn't ready to take the reigns yet, and anyone that thinks he should be in the entire game against USC are just kidding themselves.
Post a Comment
You must log in before posting. If you do not have an account, you can register one for free.